NRA Files Amicus Brief Supporting Gun Manufacturers

NRA throws its support behind the defendant in Lowy v. Daniel Defense.

by
posted on January 15, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Nra Logo Periwinkle

NRA filed an amicus brief (warning, opens a .pdf file) supporting firearm manufacturers in a case where the plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers’ pro-Second Amendment social media posts caused a third party to commit a horrific crime. The firearm manufacturers regularly post pro-Second Amendment content on social media. These posts often contain imagery of firearms, individuals in military gear, and tactical equipment and express support for the right to keep and bear arms.

After an individual used various firearms—some of which were manufactured by the defendants in this case—in a crime, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit claiming that the manufacturers’ social media posts influenced the shooter to act.

NRA’s brief focuses on certain First Amendment aspects of the case. The plaintiffs claim, in essence, that the manufacturers’ social media posts are not protected by the First Amendment because they are either (1) commercial speech or (2) incitement to violence. NRA’s brief explains that the social media posts are not commercial speech because their primary purpose is to advocate for the Second Amendment, not to facilitate a commercial transaction. And either way, the plaintiffs’ attempt to censor the posts is viewpoint discrimination based on the pro-Second Amendment views expressed in their posts, which presumptively violates the First Amendment.

Moreover, the manufacturers’ posts did not incite the shooter to commit violence. There is nothing sinister about the militaristic imagery in the posts. Rather, there has always been a synergistic connection between military, law enforcement, and the right to keep and bear arms.

At its core, this is a case where the plaintiffs are trying to censor the manufacturers because they disagree with their message. But the manufacturers have a right to speak (or post) in support of the Second Amendment, and the plaintiffs cannot violate the First Amendment to stop them from doing so.

The case, Lowy v. Daniel Defense, is currently before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. Stay tuned to nraila.org for future updates.

Latest

Charleville Musket Lede

Wow! MidwayUSA Foundation Hometown Challenge Sweepstakes Creates $1.6 Million for Youth Shooting Sports

Demonstrating the power of grassroots fundraising paired with generous corporate sponsorship.

Beretta Celebrates 50 Years of 90 Series Pistols with Special Edition

One of the most recognized and respected handgun platforms in the world gets a birthday glow-up in a very limited edition.

NRA Family Fun: Wolf Program at First Peoples Buffalo Jump State Park

This family-friendly event explores the history and impact of one of America's greatest apex predators.

Video Review: Springfield Hellcat Micro-Compact Pistol in .380 ACP

Making defensive concealed carry accessible to all with a more controllable (yet effective) round.

Reviewed: Hawk 18' Big Denali 2-Man Ladderstand

Need some creature comfort while afield? Take a look at the Hawk Denali 2-Man Ladderstand.

Interests



Get the best of NRA Family delivered to your inbox.